About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Survey of Intellectual Property Commercialization in the Higher Education Sector 2006 and 2005
Author: [Statistics Canada]
Source:

http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/88-222-XIE/88-222-XIE2008000.pdf

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: IP Protection
Focus: Commercialisation, Economic / Financial Impact
Country/Territory: Canada
Objective: To illuminate the overall process of intellectual property management in the higher education sector.
Sample: 100+ universities/degree-granting colleges (85 in 2005; 84 in 2006) and affiliated research hospitals (33)
Methodology: Survey

Main Findings

In 2006, 72.7% of participating hospitals (unchanged from 2005) and 86% of universities (4% more than in 2005) were actively managing (identifying, protecting, promoting and/or commercialising) their intellectual property (IP). 39.4% of hospitals and 67.9% of universities had one or more central offices engaged in IP management.

Universities' and hospitals' 2006 operational expenditures on IP management were C$ 42.5 million (1999: C$ 22.0 million; 2001: 28.5 million; 2003: 36.4 million; 2004: 36.9 million; 2005: 41.5 million), of which C$ 12.4 million for patent applications and regular legal expenses. IP created at the institution was in the majority of cases owned by the researcher. Institutional ownership and "joint ownership of IP - institution(s) and researcher" were the second most popular IP ownership policies. When it comes to researcher requirement to report new IP created, a substantial increase in “always report” and a substantial decrease in “no reporting policy” was observed in 2006.

In the last 5 years, 54.7% of universities and affiliated research hospitals have filed a patent application (versus 51.7% in 2005, 51% in 2004, 51% in 2003, 47.4% in 2001, and 47.6% in 1999). In 2006, hospitals and universities filed 1.442 new patent applications (versus 1.410 in 2005, 1.264 in 2004, 1.252 in 2003, 932 in 2001, and 656 in 1999) and were issued 339 patents (versus 376 in 2005, 397 in 2004, 347 in 2003, 381 in 2001, and 349 in 1999). In total, surveyed universities and hospitals held 4.784 patents (up 20.8% from 2005). The percentage of patents commercialised amounted to 45.1% (up from 45% in 2003 and 44% in 2004, down from 48.4% in 2005).

In 2006, universities and hospitals executed a total of 437 new licenses (versus 621, 494, 422, 320 and 232 in 2005, 2004, 2003, 2001 and 1999 respectively) and possessed 2.038 active licenses. University and affiliated research hospital royalty income from licensing amounted to C$ 41.2 million (up from C$ 21 million in 1999, C$ 37.8 million in 2003 and C$ 38.6 million in 2004, but down from C$ 47.6 million in 2001 and C$ 43.7 million in 2005). Between 2005 and 2006, total income from IP increased from C$ 55.2 million to C$ 59.7 million (+8.2%). To date, universities and their affiliated research hospitals have created a total of 1.103 spin-off companies to commercialise their technologies, in most cases with a view to licensing technology only (39%; unchanged from 2005; up from 36% in 2004 and 37% in 2003; down from 41% and 46% in 2001 and 1999 respectively). The value of remaining equity in spin-offs was C$ 41.5 (virtually unchanged from 2005; down from 49.8 million in 2004, from 52.4 million in 2003, from 45.1 million in 2001, and from 54.6 million in 1999).

[Date Added: Nov 20, 2008 ]