IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness
Reference
| Title: | Interview Report - China Practitioners |
| Author: | Simon Rodwell [Hunter Rodwell Consulting], Philippe Van Eeckhout [Contratak S.A.S.], Alasdair Reid and Jacek Walendowski [Technopolis] |
| Source: | European Commission |
| Year: | 2007 |
Details
| Subject/Type: | IP Protection |
| Focus: | Enforcement, Outreach / Education |
| Country/Territory: | China |
| Objective: | To evaluate the intellectual property environment for foreign SME exporters and investors in China. |
| Sample: | 11 intellectual property rights practitioners based in China |
| Methodology: | Interviews |
Main Findings
Most intellectual property (IP) practitioners agree that IP rights (IPR) abuse in China is a major problem. Still, they feel that on the whole the situation is improving, but not as fast as most people would wish. When respondents are asked to specify what IP rights are most often abused, trade names and confidential information come in first, followed by designs, trademarks, copyright, and patents/utility models.
IP practitioners agree that “some companies are very vulnerable and should not go to China”, and that “few companies can regard themselves as safe in China”. They disagree with the following two statements: “you are unlikely to encounter an IPR problem in China”, and “the authorities are helpful and effective when problems occur”.
Generally, respondents feel that central Chinese authorities are taking IP seriously, but criticise their lack of effectivity. Provincial and local authorities are perceived as taking IP matters less seriously and being less effective than their central counterparts. All IP practitioners surveyed have a positive outlook, stating that matters will improve over the next few years.
When asked to name the most effective means of IPR enforcement, the courts rank first, followed by specific IPR authorities. SMEs may want to avoid the administrative action route. Chinese Customs are also deemed effective, as well as mediation.
Most respondents are aware of Chinese government campaigns to improve education on IPR issues, but doubts regarding their effectiveness were raised. Domestically, the central government is seen as the main initiator of campaigns. Practitioners are also aware of activities by foreign organisations.
[Date Added: Nov 20, 2008 ]