About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Interaction effects in software piracy
Author: Eric Kin-wai Lau [City University of Hong Kong]
Source:

Business Ethics 16, no. 1: 34-47

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Software
Country/Territory: Hong Kong, China
Objective: To investigate determinants of software piracy, and in particular to analyse factors influencing the self-reported leniency toward software piracy.
Sample: 263 home computer users
Methodology: Questionnaire

Main Findings

The following factors are found to influence the reported leniency of individuals towards software piracy: social acceptance of pirated software (positively correlated: the more piracy is socially accepted, the more lenient individuals are towards it), monthly household income (negatively correlated: the higher the household income, the lower the reported leniency towards software piracy is), knowledge of computer software copyright law (negatively correlated: the better the knowledge, the smaller the leniency towards copying is), cost of original software (positively correlated: the more original software costs, the more lenient consumers are towards software piracy), availability of original software (negatively correlated: the better the availability of legal software, the less lenient attitudes to software piracy are) and education level (negatively correlated: the higher the education level, the lower the reported leniency towards software copying). However, the user's sense of urgency for computer software does not appear to affect reported leniency.

Efforts to combat software piracy should accordingly be directed at promoting intellectual property (IP) protection: reinforce the existence of copyright law and focus on education promoting not only the law, but also the overall concept of IP, particularly in schools. Taking advantage of the interaction effects among the aforementioned factors, software developers should implement a strategy simultaneously involving lower prices (or providing discounted packages to certain customer types), improved distribution, copyright education and social influence to maximise positive impact.

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]