About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: How well do students really understand plagiarism?
Author: Stephen Marshall and Maryanne Garry [Victoria University of Wellington]
Source:

Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/52_Marshall.pdf

Year: 2005

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy, Plagiarism
Focus: Books, Internet Sources, Software, Video Games
Country/Territory: New Zealand
Objective: To explore students' attitudes, perceptions and understanding of plagiarism and copyright violations.
Sample: 181 first-year students
Methodology: Anonymous questionnaire distributed in three different classes

Main Findings

Younger students were more likely than older students to correctly identify plagiarism. However, there was no significant evidence that would show age affecting the seriousness with which plagiarism is regarded or the extent to which it is practised.

Copyright violations of game software were perceived as less serious compared to copyright violations of commercial software, and male students admitted to copying software more frequently than female students. Plagiarism from the Internet is regarded as less serious than plagiarism from other sources, such as books.

The authors emphasise the need to provide clear definitions of what constitutes plagiarism and copyright violations, and recommend communicating this at an early age before unethical behaviour is "normalised" due to the lack of a strong, negative response from the authorities.

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]