About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: The Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy in Mexico
Author: [Grupo IDM]
Source:

U.S. Chamber Global Intellectual Property Center

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting, Piracy
Focus: Apparel and Shoes, Beverages, Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits), Consumer Electronics / Electronic Equipment, Fashion Accessories, Film, Food Products, Medicines and Medical Devices, Music, Personal Care Products, Tobacco Products, Toys, Video Games, Watches
Country/Territory: Mexico
Objective: To gauge the effects of counterfeiting and piracy, and to determine consumer perceptions towards counterfeiting and piracy.
Sample: 1183 consumers in key commercial centers in Mexico City, Guadalajara, Monterrey and Tijuana
Methodology: Face-to-face interviews

Main Findings

76% of interviewees report having purchased at least one counterfeit or pirated product. 70% do so occasionally. The most popular fake goods are: music CDs (acquired by 63% of consumers during the last 6 months), film VCDs/DVDs (38%), clothes/textiles (16%), and footwear (14%). The primary motives for purchasing fake goods are “price” (75%) and “ease of purchase” (38%). The primary place of purchase is markets/street markets. 52% consider counterfeiting/piracy “an illegal act”.

Consumers are less inclined to buy fake goods that could be detrimental to their health and/or safety: 64% would not buy fake medicines, 39% would not buy fake food, 32% would not consume counterfeit alcoholic drinks, and 20% would not acquire fake cigarettes.

More than eight in ten respondents agree that counterfeit/pirated goods: “support crime”, “weaken the Mexican economy”, “prevent excessive prices”, “are present in medicines”, and “are present in alcoholic drinks”. Around seven in ten respondents agree that fakes: “create insecurity”, “prevent brands from becoming successful”, “force brands to lower their prices”, “are present in cigarettes” and “restrict innovation”.

Interviewees rely on price (44%), packaging (43%) and material (40%), but also on the point of sale (21%) and the brand name (15%) to distinguish between authentic and fake products.

[Date Added: Mar 10, 2010 ]