About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Survey on Business Attitudes to Intellectual Property 2004
Author: [Mercado Solutions Associates Ltd]
Source:

Intellectual Property Department (Government of Hong Kong SAR)
http://www.ipd.gov.hk/eng/promotion_edu/survey.htm

Year: 2004

Details

Subject/Type: IP Knowledge, IP Protection
Focus: Commercialisation, Economic / Financial Impact, Enforcement, Outreach / Education
Country/Territory: Hong Kong, China
Objective: To investigate businesses’ awareness of and attitudes towards intellectual property rights.
Sample: 1.204 business establishments
Methodology: Mail survey

Main Findings

Intellectual property (IP) awareness of Hong Kong business establishments is generally high: about nine in ten respondents were aware that IP covered trademarks (99.9%), copyright (99.5%), patents (97.2%) and designs (89.3%). 95% considered that it was very or quite necessary to protect IP rights in Hong Kong's business environment, while only 2.3% did not. 93% were aware of IP protection legislation. Furthermore, an overwhelming majority of businesses surveyed (95%) considered IPs valuable assets of a company. Accordingly, 88.4% agreed that protecting/registering IP was beneficial to their company (as a protection to prevent others from copying/using their IP; as a means of building up reputation/goodwill, and of earning income).

While 40% of respondents considered the IP protection in place adequate, more than half (54.6%) did not. 77.8% supported "raising awareness of IP rights protection/strengthening education", and more than one in two respondents was in favour of more enforcement (54.4%) and harsher penalties for infringements (51.2%).

12.5% of business establishments reported having registered IP (trademarks, patens or designs), whereas a majority (87.5%) had not done so. Larger businesses were more likely to have registered IP. Staff specifically responsible for IP management is not too common: only one in ten businesses reported having any employee(s) responsible for IP management. 40% of respondents would check the Hong Kong trademark register before using/adopting their own trademark, while 60% would not; over 80% reported searching the patent register so as to avoid infringing others' inventions.

Most businesses (85.4%) considered IP protection as helpful to the development of local creative industries. Three in four respondents (75.6%) agreed that IP rights protection was helpful for enhancing the creation of business opportunity and wealth, and 67% considered it helpful for Hong Kong's overall economic development.

Generally, most business establishments were aware of the Intellectual Property Department (IPD) and its activities; however, knowledge about specific services and activities varied. The most common misconceptions of IPD were that: it receives complaints regarding IP violations (55.2%); it investigates IP infringements (46.4%), and that it combats piracy and counterfeiting (44.4%). The most effective channel for the IPD's advertising and promotional campaigns seems to be TV (with 90.5% encountering IPD activities in that medium), followed by radio (52.7%), print ad/promotional materials (40.9%), and seminars/exhibitions (11.7%). Favourable and unfavourable opinions regarding the effectiveness of IPD's outreach activities were evenly split (45.5% considered them effective, while 47.8% did not).

[Date Added: Aug 18, 2008 ]