About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Digital Music Survey
Author: [Ipsos]
Source:

Demos
http://www.demos.co.uk/files/DemosMusicsurvey.ppt

Year: 2009

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Music
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To examine the awareness and usage of legal and illegal online music services, and to find out how to encourage the use of legal and discourage the use of illegal online music services.
Sample: 1,008 adults aged 16-50 years representative of the UK online populartion
Methodology: Online interviews

Main Findings

69% of British online adults use one or more official music services, such as YouTube, iTunes or Internet radio. Top reasons given for using official music services are “easy to use” (54%), “convenient” (51%), “ability to listen while using computer” (48%), “range of music available” (40%), “to hear new music that I would not normally hear” (35%), and “to save money” (33%).

By contrast, 33% of respondents report using unofficial music services, such as file-sharing programs, online storage services and Google or other search engines to find albums/tracks to download for free. 62% do not use any unofficial music services. 26% of users of unofficial music services say that these services make them buy more music, 47% about the same, and 19% less.

28% of users of unofficial music services report that they download music through these services without permission of the copyright holder. Overall, such illegal downloaders are likely to be male (57% males), to be aged under 35 (7 in 10), and to own a mobile music player (9 in 10). Top reasons given for downloading illegally are: “because I can/it is available” (46%), “trying out before deciding to buy” (42%), “can find things I cannot find on commercial legal sites” (32%), “do not have enough money to pay for the music that I want” (27%), “because lots of people I know do the same” (27%), and “I have already bought the things I download on CD/vinyl”. The main barriers to downloading without permission of the copyright holder are legal concerns, worries about viruses/spyware and moral objections.

Top reasons encouraging people to stop using unofficial services for accessing music without permission are: “availability of new appealing legal music services” (a reason to stop for 64% of illegal downloaders and a perceived reason to stop for 61% of legal downloaders), “threat of having Internet service suspended for one month” (61% and 70%), “threat of receiving a fine” (61% and 73%), “concerns about getting a virus/spyware” (58% and 54%), and “receiving a warning letter from your Internet service provider (ISP)” (57% and 55%).

[Date Added: Mar 10, 2010 ]