[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]
[process2-comments] RFC-1
To: | process.mail@wipo.int | |
Subject: | [process2-comments] RFC-1 | |
From: | MedicalCMT@aol.com | |
Date: | Wed, 16 Aug 2000 20:23:38 +0200 |
Name: Coralie Jenner Intellectual property is Real Estate and should be regarded as such. Investors buy land in hopes that people will build on it, or buy buildings in which people will rent space. Intellectual property is the same. First com, first serve. Some protection against TradeMarks are necessary. Geographical indications protection is ridiculous. Perhaps when someone registers an acronym, they should be required at the time of registry to spell out the acronym to avoid later dispute about intent. Perhaps it should be registry's responsibility to prohibit the sale of trademarked or prohibited names. Meaning when an individual searches for a name to buy, it should not be shown as available. Should the laws change, they should not affect the people who own names prior to the date the new laws taking effect. A "grand-fathering" is going to have to take place for it can not be the responsibility of the individuals who were not breaking any laws at the times of purchase. |
- Prev by Date: [process2-comments] RFC-1
- Next by Date: [process2-comments] RFC-1
- Index(es):