About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

browse comments: WIPO RFC-3

WIPO RFC-3
Italian Naming Authority (process@wipo2.wipo.int)
Mon, 8 Mar 1999 10:31:54 -0500

Browse by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: erony@marin.k12.ca.us: "WIPO RFC-3"
Previous message: mueller@syr.edu: "WIPO RFC-3"


From: "Italian Naming Authority" <process@wipo2.wipo.int>
Subject: WIPO RFC-3

From: the Italian Naming Authority
To: WIPO - Internet Domain Names Process.

Besides the comments we already expressed at the Brussels regional meeting on February 17th 1999, we would also express our comments about
Chapter 4 of the current draft report (sessions 202 - 245).

As a general comment, the Italian Naming Authority (briefly It-NA)
expressed a general concern about the principle of protecting "famous and well-known marks" as indicated in chapter 4. We believe that any kind of classification of a mark as "famous" or "well-known" will simply result is a nearly impossible to solve problem. i.e. possibly endless discussion to compile the "list" of famous marks. It can also happen that a well known mark belongs to more than one owner, and each one has the right to use it: in real life...

Ferrari

brand of famous sport cars?

brand of famous sparkling wine?

As such It-NA reccomends in general NOT to create the list of "famous"
and "well-known" marks, and NOT to protect them in any special way with
respoct to the other marks.

Specifically:

218: It-NA disagrees. It will create problems in establishing the list
of exclusions.

221: as above.

223: as above. The creation of the decision-makers will result in serious legal problems under many national legislations.

225: It-NA agrees on this reccommendation, but we hope it is simply not
useful as there is NOT a list of famous and well-known marks.

234: when the matter relates to "famous" or "well-known" marks, the
distinction between gTLDs and ccTLDs is very thin, often non esisting.
This reccommendation can introduce even worst conflict cases.

245: Under "it" ccTLD it is already in effect since 1996 the principle where anybody requesting a domain registration for a name self-declares his right to use that name, and accepts the cancellation of his registration if his declaration proves to be false.

 -- Posted automatically from Process Web site

Next message: erony@marin.k12.ca.us: "WIPO RFC-3"
Previous message: mueller@syr.edu: "WIPO RFC-3"