About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

browse comments: Comment from Strategize.com RE WIPO Internet Domain Name Process

Comment from Strategize.com RE WIPO Internet Domain Name Process
Clive Boustred (Clive@strategize.com)
Thu, 13 Aug 1998 15:21:40 -0000

Browse by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael Sondow: "Request for Extension (fwd)"
Previous message: LGrif71872@aol.com: "WIPO RFC-1"


Advanced Technical Strategy, Inc. assists large-scale organizations in
developing distributed systems strategy (Internet, e-commerce, massively
scalar systems etc.), included is our 2c worth regarding Trademark and
Internet Domain Name concerns.

INTERNET DOMAINS > TRADEMARKS

It must firstly be recognized that countries individual trademark bodies are
substantially subordinate to the Internet domain registration system. This
may come as a shock to many of these lesser trademark organizations, however
Internet spans the globe in one large network that is not divided by smaller
incompatible and unintegrated fiefdoms.

Just as all the different countries individual governmental trademark bodies
have problems with trademark infringements, which are often due to the
simple fact that trademark owners in another country did not register their
trademarks with each and every individual countries governmental trademark
body before someone else took the name, Internet Domain Name registration
faces the same problems. However, one must recognize that at least Internet
Domain Name registration is global, something that does not seem to have
been obtained by the more antiquated individual trademark bodies.

So in light of these simple facts, if a company or an individual is not up
to date enough to register a domain name on the Internet, then it is that
companies or individuals problem and not the Internet Domain Registration
Service's problem. It is certainly much simple and vastly less complicated
to register a domain name than it is to protect a trademark around the
globe.

It is time to face the facts, Internet has superceded the lesser trademark
organizations, these organizations should fall in line behind the Internet's
naming infrastructure, or at least offer something that is as simple and as
cost effective to use.

Kindest regards,

Clive

P.S. Not to be rude, but do you think anyone on the Internet is going to
bother with WIPO? I just happened to come across your article in a minor
InfoWorld article and thought you may appreciate some input.

-----------------------------------------------
Clive Boustred
Chief Strategist
(408) 476-4300
clive@strategize.com
http://www.strategize.com
Advanced Technical Strategy, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------


Next message: Michael Sondow: "Request for Extension (fwd)"
Previous message: LGrif71872@aol.com: "WIPO RFC-1"