About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

browse comments: WIPO RFC-1

WIPO RFC-1
nomen@mail.cinet.es
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 07:44:50 -0400

Browse by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: perugini@planet.it: "WIPO RFC-1"
Previous message: msondow@ic.sunysb.edu: "WIPO RFC-1"


From: nomen@mail.cinet.es
Subject: WIPO RFC-1

Deseo felicitarles por el texto preparado y en especial por incluir el punto A-prevención de litigios c) relativo a una eventual utilización de un anuario o páginas de acceso que permitirían la coexistencia de signos idénticos legítimos.

Les sugiero la lectura de un interesantísimo artículo titulado "Things can get worse" publicado en el Intellectual Property de American Lawyer Media Inc de Julio Agosto 1998. En este artículo se defienden los sistemas de acceso previo (menus de acceso, pantallas intermedias) que permiten la legítima coexistencia de signos idénticos.
En este artículo se incluye además un interesante concepto que creo puede ser objeto de debate:

La territorialización de los nombres de dominio. Propone la obligación de que todo nuevo dominio deba corresponder a un DNS nacional, por ejemplo DN.com.us. El problema por resolver es qué hacer con los existentes, pero creo que es un tema interesante a debatir. Es más, creo que si en una revista como IP Worlwide se plantea este tema, es importante debatirlo.

 -- Posted automatically from Process Web site

Next message: perugini@planet.it: "WIPO RFC-1"
Previous message: msondow@ic.sunysb.edu: "WIPO RFC-1"