WIPO RFC-1
eggplant@ix.netcom.com
Fri, 10 Jul 1998 12:48:27 -0400
Browse by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: marcmcswain@email.msn.com: "WIPO RFC-1"
Previous message: B.K. DeLong: "Domain Name disputes"
From: eggplant@ix.netcom.com
Subject: WIPO RFC-1
I see no reason to protect tradmarks in the existing gTLDs. Such protection would limit political expression for individuals and groups commenting on the behavior of corporations.
Already, we have seen Wal-Mart attempt to shut down www.walmartsucks.com over the use of the wallmart trademark in the domain name (to cite just one example). This web site is devoted to archiving complaints about Wall-Mart's business practices.
If trademarks/corporate-names are protected as domain names in the existing gTLDs, then corporations will immediately start asking for tradmarks to be protected within domain names as well. They will begin using decisions in relatively normal disputes (for example, if there was a William Allmart, CPA who registered the domain name walmartcpa.com, and such a domain name were revoked as a result of the similarity in names) as precidents in an attempt to reduce or eliminate sites such as wallmartsucks.com.
If corporations feel that there is a compelling need to maintain a gTLD where domain names are distributed in a more corporate-friendly manner, then they should create a tm gTLD, so individuals can go to www.walmart.tm, and be assured that the web site is actually associated with Wal-Mart. Granted, this .tm gTLD will not have the same level of familiarity as .com, and will not be automatically searched by web browsers when the user types "walmart" as the URL, but these conditions would undoubtably change in time, as user's become more accustomed to the gTLD and new versions of browsers are released.
Like it or not, .com serves not just companies, but pretty much anything that is not military, an organized political group, or a school. It has become a common area, not a corporate area, and should not be regulated with corporate goals.
The individual countries should be responsible for setting and enforcing policies for their own ccTLDs.
-- Posted automatically from Process Web site
Next message: marcmcswain@email.msn.com: "WIPO RFC-1"
Previous message: B.K. DeLong: "Domain Name disputes"