About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 352   document(s)s (0.048 sec)

Rows

1 - 20  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1025 for viagraoysters.com html (20 KB)

The mere addition of a generic or descriptive term to the VIAGRA mark at issue here results in a domain name that is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s VIAGRA mark. ...Not only does the domain name itself infringe the Complainant’s rights in its VIAGRA trademark, but the goods available for sale on Respondent’s site bear the VIAGRA trademark in violation of the Complainant’s well established trademark rights in the VIAGRA mark. ...

2007-11-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1854 for viagra.ninja html (20 KB)

That website offers products branded as "Viagra Oral Jelly", "Viagra Professional", "Viagra Soft Tabs", "Viagra Super Active", which are in product formats in which authentic VIAGRA brand products are not sold and which are not genuine VIAGRA brand products. ...Respondents' website offers products branded as "Viagra Oral Jelly," "Viagra Professional," "Viagra Soft Tabs," "Viagra Super Active," which are in product formats in which authentic VIAGRA brand products are not sold and which are not genuine VIAGRA brand products. ...

2014-12-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-1455 for wwwviagra.com html (15 KB)

The Respondent says it put up the site as a satisfied user of the product VIAGRA, and wishes to provide the ability for consumers who are interested in VIAGRA to purchase it online. ...As indicated above, the Respondent states that he put up the site as a satisfied user of the product VIAGRA, and wishes to provide the ability for consumers who are interested in VIAGRA to purchase it online. ...

2002-03-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2367 for direttaviagra.com, viagradirect.co, viagradirect.com, viagradirect.com.co, viagradirect.org, viagradirecte.com, viagradirecto.co, viagradirecto.com, viagradirecto.com.co, viagradirecto.org, viagradireto.com, viagradiretto.com html (25 KB)

Currently, the disputed domain name resolves to a website, on which under the title, "Buy This Domain", the following "Sponsored Listings" are displayed: "Buy Viagra online", "Viagra 100 mg, "Viagra SIDE Effects", "Purchase Viagra online", "Viagra", "Direct to", and "Buy Viagra Online". ...As to the use of the disputed domain names, the Panel notes that the disputed domain name presently resolves to a website displaying, under the title "Buy This Domain", the following "sponsored listings": "Buy Viagra online", "Viagra 100 mg", "Viagra SIDE Effects", "Purchase Viagra online", "Viagra", and "Direct To". ...

2017-01-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1855 for viagraninja.com html (16 KB)

Respondent is not commonly known by the name "Viagra," "viagraninja.com" or any variation thereof. Accordingly, the Respondent has no trademark rights in the mark VIAGRA 6.9. ...The Respondent's repeated references to a purported VIAGRA product, and products that compete with VIAGRA, confirm the Respondent's awareness of the Complainant's VIAGRA mark. ...

2014-12-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0133 for fem-viagra.com, fem-viagra.net, viagra-fem.com, viagra-fem.net html (19 KB)

The Domain Names and Registrar The domain names in issue are , , <viagra-fem.com> and <viagra-fem.net> ("Domain Names"). The registrar of the Domain Names is Go Daddy Software, Inc. ...The Panelist finds that the Complainant has provided sufficient evidence to establish that it is the owner of and has rights in the mark VIAGRA. A review of the Domain Names shows that each domain name fully incorporates the mark VIAGRA and only differs from the mark by the addition of the phrase "fem" and a hyphen preceding or following the mark VIAGRA. ...

2003-04-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0158 for half-price-viagra.com html (10 KB)

Complainant asserts that the domain name is confusingly similar to VIAGRA. The registration was made on June 29, 2003, without authorization. The Respondent’s domain name (i) wholly incorporates the VIAGRA trademark; (ii) is identical to the VIAGRA mark but for the addition of the common terms “half” and “price”; and (iii) is so clearly similar to Complainant’s VIAGRA mark and tradename that it is likely to cause confusion among Complainant’s customers and the consuming public. ...Furthermore, the Respondent advertises sildenafil citrate as “Generic Viagra” and Cialis as “super viagra” on its website, in addition to genuine Viagra® brand sildenafil citrate. ...

2005-05-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0668 for viagra-tw.net html (15 KB)

The Complainant has been using the VIAGRA in connection with its product in the United States since April 6, 1998. The Complainant owns numerous trademark registrations for the mark VIAGRA. ...The Complainant further argues it had not licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use its VIAGRA trademark and is not affiliated or otherwise connected to the Respondent. The Complainant further argues that the Respondent is not commonly known by the name “viagra”, “viagra-tw” or any variation thereof. ...

2011-06-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0155 for viagra-price-guide.org html (22 KB)

original emphasis) To the right are four “buttons”: labeled, respectively, “best buy Generic Cialis”, “best buy Cialis”, “best buy Generic Viagra” and “best buy Viagra”. Immediately beneath these is a picture of a capsule and the words “Sildenafil citrate/Generic Viagra 100mg”. ...The Allpills site appears to offer for sale only (so far as relevant) “Generic Viagra ®” and “Gen Softabs Viagra ®”, where other material indicates that “Gen” stands for “generic”. The print-out of the “Omnigen” site offers for sale only “Generic Viagra®” and also states “VIAGRA for WOMEN? ...

2005-05-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0439 for viagra.biz html (24 KB)

The Complainant contends that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the mark VIAGRA, in which Pfizer has rights, because the disputed domain name wholly incorporates Pfizer's registered VIAGRA mark. ...d. the Respondent is not, nor ever has been, a representative of Pfizer or licensed to use the VIAGRA mark. C.2 Use in bad faith VIAGRA is a world famous mark that is recognized worldwide by consumers and professionals. ...

2009-05-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0870 for viagraconfidential.com html (19 KB)

The home page of this domain refers to "Europe’s most Discreet and Reliable Discount Chemists for the supply of both ‘Viagra’ and ‘Kamagra’" and states that the business is "Based in the U.K.". The site offers two products for sale; firstly VIAGRA, and secondly a product called ‘Kamagra’ which is described as a ‘generic brand of Viagra’ and as having "exactly the same chemical composition as Viagra. ...In the U.K. ‘Viagra Confidential’ is represented by European Health Care Services Ltd., In America and Central Europe ‘Viagra Confidential’ is represented by Gifts n Presents Inc." ...

2004-01-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1967 for viagrachile.com html (15 KB)

What remains, “viagrachile”, comprises two parts: “viagra”, and “chile”. The key component is the word “viagra”, which clearly is identical to the Complainant's trademark. ...Pfizer Inc. v. Order Viagra Online, supra. As mentioned above, the Respondent's website leads to several VIAGRA products and other competitors' products that are offered for sale. ...

2009-03-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-1329 for viagrastories.com html (32 KB)

Respondent links to a pharmacy which only sells authentic VIAGRA. Respondent is truthfully doing precisely what the Domain Name states, namely, publishing “Viagra Stories.” ...D2004-0731 (October 24, 2004) (addition of generic words “blu” to form domain name deemed “confusingly similar to the Complainant’s VIAGRA mark”); Pfizer Inc v. Phillip Pizzurro, WIPO Case No. D2004-0600 (October 2, 2004) (addition of descriptive term “generic” to Pfizer’s VIAGRA mark in domain <viagra-generic.org> found confusingly similar to Pfizer’s VIAGRA trademark); Pfizer Inc v. ...

2006-03-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0366 for tryviagra.com html (32 KB)

As indicated on this record, the Respondent registered this name with Dotster on September 4, 2001. A. "Viagra" Marks The Complainant owns a single United States registration and various foreign trademark registrations and applications for the mark "VIAGRA" (collectively the "Viagra" Marks) on which this dispute is based. ...Similarity The Complainant contends that the contested domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's mark "VIAGRA". Specifically, the Complainant contends that the contested domain name : wholly incorporates the Complainant's VIAGRA mark; is identical to the VIAGRA mark but for the additional common word ‘try’; and is confusingly similar to the Complainant's use of its VIAGRA mark. ...

2002-08-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0156 for freegenericviagra.com html (11 KB)

At such site, consumers are offered “FREE” generic viagra. According to the site, consumers need only pay a “small” shipping fee for the generic viagra.   5. ...It notes that Complainant’s adoption and use of the VIAGRA mark precedes the Respondent’s registration of and contends that Respondent clearly had knowledge of the VIAGRA mark prior to registration of the domain name. ...

2005-05-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2205 for viagraalamiindonesia.com html (27 KB)

The Complainant asserts that it owns numerous VIAGRA trademark registrations around the world and that its VIAGRA trademarks enjoy a worldwide reputation through marketing, advertising, and promotion for years. In particular, the Complainant is the owner of numerous trademark registrations for the VIAGRA in more than 150 countries , including U.S Trademark Registration No. 2,162,548 issued June 2, 1998 for VIAGRA for goods/services in classes 6, 18, 44, 46, 51 and 52; and Indonesia Trademark Registration No. 400731 for VIAGRA for goods in Class 5. ...

2015-03-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0589 for generic-viagra-online.com html (20 KB)

As shown by the printout of the relevant pages of the website to which the Domain Name resolves, headed “Generic Viagra” (Annex 6), Respondent advertises and sells, together with Complainant’s product “Pfizer Viagra”, various other competing products having “the same active ingredient as brand name Viagra: 100% Sildenafil Citrate”. ...Furthermore, the printout of the relevant pages of Respondent’s website “generic-viagra-online.com” shows that Respondent has been using the Domain Name to promote and sell, for commercial gain, sildenafil citrate pharmaceutical products as “generic Viagra”, which directly compete with Complainant’s genuine Viagra. ...

2004-10-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1838 for viagraotc.net html (19 KB)

The Complainant and its affiliates own trademark registrations for the VIAGRA mark in more than 150 countries in the world, as shown in the list of trademark registrations for VIAGRA submitted as Annex 4 to the Complaint. ...The Complainant also states that the Respondent’s references, on the web site corresponding to the disputed domain name, to erectile dysfunction, to purported Viagra product and to products that compete with Viagra tablets, confirms the Respondent’s awareness of the Complainant’s VIAGRA mark. ...

2012-11-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-1242 for viagraring.com html (21 KB)

Respondent uses the domain name to sell rings intended to be used to store VIAGRA or other products that compete with VIAGRA, and his site links to an online pharmacy which promotes sale of VIAGRA and products that compete with VIAGRA. ...This could be VIAGRA or, as Respondent advertises, it could be Cialis or Levitra, both of which compete with VIAGRA, or any other type of pill for that matter. ...

2006-12-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4314 for viagrataiwan.com pdf (163 KB)

The Complainant is the registered owner of the VIAGRA and VIAGRA-formative trade marks in many jurisdictions including in Taiwan (Province of China). ...TMA506911 for VIAGRA, registered on April 13, 1999; and - Canadian registration No. TMA1087683 for VIAGRA CONNECT, registered on November 16, 2020; and The disputed domain name was registered on July 8, 2023. ...

2023-12-07 - Case Details