the Complainant and its products (section C below), the Respondent’s conduct amounts to so-called “typosquatting”. The Complainant meets the...
2007-05-11 - Case Details
area on the same day as the Disputed Domain Name indicating what is now generally known as “taster” activity, involving typosquatting. This adds...
2007-05-10 - Case Details
the Respondent’s use of the Domain Name is merely a form of “typosquatting”. In summary, the Complainant submits that the Domain Name was acquired in...
2007-03-29 - Case Details
Complainant’s trademark. The Complainant claims that the registration of the domain name at issue is an example of typosquatting. The Complainant contends that...
2007-03-07 - Case Details
the registration of the domain name at issue is an example of typosquatting. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions...
2007-03-07 - Case Details
registration and use pursuant to Policy, paragraph�4(b)(iv). The slight difference between “euro600” and “EURO 6000” constitutes typosquatting, and also...
2007-02-01 - Case Details
is easily confused with its well-known WNYC mark. Complainant contents that this amounts to “typosquatting” and cites some of the many cases in which...
2007-01-09 - Case Details
Internet users typing an incorrect address when seeking to access the Complainant’s website. This practice of “typosquatting” has been dealt with in many...
2006-12-28 - Case Details
of a “typosquatting” domain name seeks to attract and mislead consumers seeking information from the Pfizer patient assistance programs. Thus...
2006-11-02 - Case Details
for commercial gain. Complainant also states that Respondent’s registration and use of a misspelled domain name constitutes “typosquatting,” which in...
2004-07-16 - Case Details
to dismiss; registering domain name that is slight misspelling of protected mark constitutes impermissible “typosquatting”). B. Rights or Legitimate...
2004-06-18 - Case Details
NEXXUS mark, and to Complainant’s domain name , and that Respondent is “typosquatting” (omitting a period from Complainant’s domain name), such that the...
2006-07-26 - Case Details
a letter is commonly known as typosquatting. The latter reinforces similarity between the disputed domain names and the trademarks of the Complainant...
2006-05-08 - Case Details
, WIPO Case No. D2002-0410 ). Such evidence of ‘typosquatting’ indicates that there would be an initial confusion for any internet user who accesses the...
2005-09-12 - Case Details
name . C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith Complainant has submitted sufficient evidence to show that the Respondent is engaged in a typosquatting...
2005-06-27 - Case Details
is convinced that “typosquatting” of this nature amounts in and of itself to bad faith use and registration. In this regard, the Panel is guided by...
2005-06-16 - Case Details
commonly known as typosquatting and is firmly condemned in several WIPO cases. The other difference between the contested domain name and the Complainant’s...
2005-04-21 - Case Details
name is only one letter different from the Complainant’s mark that it constitutes as “typical case of typosquatting”. Similarly, it is not uncommon for...
2005-03-16 - Case Details
trademarks. The Respondent seems to be engaged in the practice of typosquatting, which consists of registering misspelled trademarks as domain names, and then...
2004-11-10 - Case Details
D2003-0445 , another typosquatting case, to state that “ [in that case,] Respondent’s diversion of Internet users to an identical or similar search engine...Complainant has prevailed in other cases handled under the Policy. However, said cases were typosquatting cases, i.e.,: Sallie Mae, Inc. v. Martin Marketing...
2004-11-09 - Case Details