About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 4247   document(s)s (0.06 sec)

Rows

<<  <  21 - 40  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0970 for boscolotour.com html (12 KB)

registration of BOSCOLO�TOURS in respect travel arrangement. It is satisfied that the Complainant has trademark rights. This case is a so-called “typosquatting...these circumstances, this Panel takes into account previous UDRP decisions relating to this practice of “typosquatting” e.g. Bang & Olufsen a/s v. Unasi...

2005-11-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1507 for eddreams.com html (12 KB)

appropriation of its fanciful mark for use in the Disputed Domain Name. Typosquatting is a commonly and widely recognized form of Internet cyberquatting and is...Respondent has engaged in a history of typosquatting, for example: see SYTradingPost, Inc. v. OS Domain Holdings IV, LLC, WIPO Case No. D2008-0815 and BHP...

2010-02-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1162 for buggieunlimtted.com html (10 KB)

do not significantly affect the appearance or pronunciation of its mark, and reflect what is commonly referred to as “typosquatting.” ii. Respondent’s...that Respondent’s typosquatting is in itself evidence of bad faith. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to Complainant’s contentions.   6...

2007-10-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1815 for www-westjet.com html (10 KB)

domain name is a form of typosquatting. The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has a history of similar unauthorized domain name registrations, and...complainant to warrant relief. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar This case presents a form of typosquatting. The disputed domain name merely substitutes a...

2011-01-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1944 for goodwilll.org pdf (173 KB)

using the Disputed Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. Additionally, typosquatting is evidence of a lack of rights...Domain Name in bad faith. First, typosquatting, such as the addition of a letter, is evidence that Respondent was aware of and sought to impersonate...

2022-08-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2658 for jindelstainless.com pdf (139 KB)

is concerned, the Complainant says that this amounts to a case of typosquatting of its mark, which is very well-reputed in India and elsewhere, and...intentional misspelling of a trademark (i.e., “typosquatting”). See WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview...

2023-09-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2305 for technipenergles.store pdf (147 KB)

domain name consists of an obvious typosquatting variation of the Complainant’s distinctive trade mark. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the...domain name is a clear case of typosquatting. It is well established that typosquatting can constitute confusing similarity. See, for example, The Citco...

2023-07-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0589 for tettrrapak.com pdf (40 KB)

misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark. The misspelling is typosquatting. The generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.com” should be ignored. The Complainant...typical case of typosquatting, which is designed to confuse users (Redbox Automated Retail, page 3 LLC d/b/a Redbox v. Milen Radumilo, WIPO Case No. D2019...

2023-04-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0130 for tronoxo.com pdf (148 KB)

typosquatting is evidence of a lack of rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Name, see Redbox Automated Retail, LLC d/b/a Redbox v. Milen Radumilo...registered and used the Disputed Domain Name in bad faith. First, typosquatting, such as the addition of a letter, is evidence that Respondent was aware of and...

2023-03-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0517 for amazoh.com, qmqzon.com, smszon.com html (30 KB)

confusingly similar to its AMAZON marks, and reflect a form of cybersquatting commonly referred to as “typosquatting”. The Complainant alleges that the true...typosquatting engaged in by the Respondent. Finally, the Complainant maintains that the disputed domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith by...

2006-07-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2016-0008 for firstaim.co html (14 KB)

as opposed to the generic Top-Level Domain ("gTLD") ".com". This constitutes typosquatting, which is generally insufficient to distinguish a domain...Faith Typosquatting and registration of the Disputed Domain Name for use in a phishing scam are both evidence of bad faith. The Respondent registered and...

2016-04-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1599 for landsigyr.com html (17 KB)

reversal of the letters ‘i’ and ‘s’ and the Top-Level Domain (“TLD”) “.com”. The Disputed Domain Name is a clear example of typosquatting as described in...Respondent did not reply. The Disputed Domain Name is clearly an example of typosquatting registered in connection with the Complainant’s brand. In addition...

2020-08-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1544 for asnedia.com html (16 KB)

the disputed domain name is an intentional misspelling of its trademark, which constitutes typosquatting, insufficient to materially distinguish a...official domain name . The Panel finds this to be a clear case of typosquatting, wherein Respondent has purposefully misspelled the trademark ASENDIA. As...

2020-08-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1311 for acceutnre.com html (18 KB)

notices that the word “acceutnre” incorporated by the disputed domain name is an intentional misspelling of its trademark, what constitutes typosquatting...official domain name . The Panel finds this to be a clear case of typosquatting, wherein Respondent has purposefully misspelled the trademark ACCENTURE. As...

2020-08-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0032 for ationalexpress.com, mationalexpress.com, naionalexpress.com, natinalexpress.com, natinoalexpress.com, natioalexpress.com, natioanlexpress.com, nationaexpress.com, nationalepress.com, nationalexoress.com, nationalexpess.com, nationalexpres.com, nationalexpresses.com ... html (23 KB)

Disputed Domain Names evidence a clear case of “typosquatting”. 1 Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests with respect to...typosquatting, resulting in the confusing similarity of the subject domain names with Complainant’s Mark, the Panel does not find that Respondent is using any of...

2008-03-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1300 for bfobank.com html (15 KB)

Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name clearly constitutes typosquatting, a practice entailing both confusing similarity and lack of legitimate...advantage of its potential BFORBANK clients; vii. It is well settled under the Policy that typosquatting in and of itself constitutes bad faith registration...

2010-10-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0992 for vibramfivesfingers.com html (17 KB)

letter “s” accumulates to “typosquatting”. 4. The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name, since the Respondent does...identical to a well-known mark, except for a slight light deviation, is commonly referred to as “typosquatting” (see ESPN, Inc. v. XC2, WIPO Case No. D2005...

2010-08-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1089 for tetrapaks.net html (8 KB)

the Complainant’s trademark and adds the letter “s”. This is a case of “typosquatting” where a trademark is misspelt by the addition of an extra letter...Complainant’s trademark. The mark is replicated and an “s” added. This is an obvious case of typosquatting. Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy has been established...

2015-09-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1629 for vrnvvare.com html (9 KB)

typosquatting”. Though the Panel would not choose that term to describe the Respondent’s conduct in this case, the issue is a technical one, not outcome...determinative. The term “typosquatting”—as a portmanteau of “typographical error” and “cybersquatting”—presumes an opportunistic act on the part of a domain name...

2016-09-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-3354 for wikiredia.com html (9 KB)

confusion on the Internet for commercial gain and disrupting the Complainant’s business. Typosquatting is registration and use in bad faith per se. B...typosquatting registration. Typosquatting is also an indication of a lack of rights or legitimate interests. The Respondent has not answered this Complaint or...

2021-12-02 - Case Details