About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 3992   document(s)s (0.06 sec)

Rows

<<  <  1961 - 1980  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0395 for wwwsallybeauty.com html (11 KB)

name . C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith Complainant has submitted sufficient evidence to show that the Respondent is engaged in a typosquatting...

2005-06-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0170 for micorcenter.com html (13 KB)

is convinced that “typosquatting” of this nature amounts in and of itself to bad faith use and registration. In this regard, the Panel is guided by...

2005-06-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0133 for tagheur.com html (12 KB)

commonly known as typosquatting and is firmly condemned in several WIPO cases. The other difference between the contested domain name and the Complainant’s...

2005-04-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0015 for specialitystoreservices.com, specialtystoresservices.com html (13 KB)

name is only one letter different from the Complainant’s mark that it constitutes as “typical case of typosquatting”. Similarly, it is not uncommon for...

2005-03-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-1051 for roberthamm.com html (11 KB)

clearly typosquatting on Complainant’s mark for commercial gain. Accordingly, the Panel finds that Respondent has registered and is using the Domain Name in...

2005-03-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0495 for nexxuscom.com, wwwnexxus.net, wwwnexxuscom.com html (12 KB)

NEXXUS mark, and to Complainant’s domain name , and that Respondent is “typosquatting” (omitting a period from Complainant’s domain name), such that the...

2006-07-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0746 for thompsongrassvalley.com html (13 KB)

trademarks. The Respondent seems to be engaged in the practice of typosquatting, which consists of registering misspelled trademarks as domain names, and then...

2004-11-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0648 for sallie.com html (41 KB)

D2003-0445 , another typosquatting case, to state that “ [in that case,] Respondent’s diversion of Internet users to an identical or similar search engine...Complainant has prevailed in other cases handled under the Policy. However, said cases were typosquatting cases, i.e.,: Sallie Mae, Inc. v. Martin Marketing...

2004-11-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0263 for monntage.com html (10 KB)

Mark by only adding an additional letter “n”. This is a clear case of typosquatting, and the disputed domain name is nearly identical and confusingly...

2022-03-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0213 for checkintocashs.com html (10 KB)

“s” in the Domain Name smacks of typosquatting, and the fact that the Domain Name resolves to a website offering services in competition with...

2022-03-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0344 for docsusign.com html (12 KB)

“.com”. The addition of the extra “s” in the disputed domain name represents typosquatting. This close misspelling renders the disputed domain name...

2010-05-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1322 for ballardsdesign.com html (10 KB)

such difference has no legal significance to avoid a finding of confusing similarity but has legal significance as being “typosquatting”, a conduct found...

2009-12-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DFR2009-0026 for 3suiises.fr html (12 KB)

domaine est un agissement typique de “cybersquatting”, plus précisément de “typosquatting”. De fait, ce dépôt conduit à des exploitations injustifiées des...

2009-11-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1154 for nationiwide.com html (11 KB)

typosquat upon the NATIONWIDE trademark and , one of the Complainant's websites through which it conducts a significant amount of business. The Respondent has...confusion and constitutes typosquatting. (See The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. v. Act One Internet Solutions , WIPO Case No. D2003-0103 ) Therefore, the panel...

2009-10-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1104 for jackpotcitycasini.com html (10 KB)

mention that the Respondent's “typosquatting” use of a common typographical error that Internet users make when they are likely trying to find a web site...

2009-10-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1094 for legoclb.com html (10 KB)

that Respondent's “typosquatting” use of a common typographical error that Internet users make when they are likely trying to find a web site associated...

2009-10-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-2162 for allsate.com html (10 KB)

quickly typing in a domain name. Numerous UDRP panels have agreed that the deliberate and obvious misspelling of a mark constitutes “typosquatting”, and...

2011-02-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1816 for westjetvacation.com html (10 KB)

or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name as contemplated by paragraph 4(c) of the Policy. 3. The Respondents have engaged in typosquatting...

2011-01-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2010-0032 for rigzone.co html (10 KB)

Respondent is profiting from such use. The Complainant says that this is effectively a case of typosquatting in which the Disputed Domain Name differs from the...

2011-01-06 - Case Details