See for example Sanofi-Aventis v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0987; F. Hoffmann La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. ...ActiveIdeas.com,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0830; Sanofi-Aventis v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. 2006-0987; F. Hoffmann La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-01-29 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration
and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE
PANEL DECISION
Accor v. Jason Peterson
Case No. D2006-0356
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Accor, Evry, France, represented by Cabinet Dreyfus & Associés, Paris, France.
The Respondent is Jason Peterson, activeideas.com, Quaker Hill, Connecticut,
United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with
DomainAllies.com, Inc. ...
2006-06-13 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Sanofi-Aventis v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson
Case No. D2006-0987
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Sanofi-Aventis, Gentilly, France, represented by Bird & Bird Solicitors, France.
The Respondent is ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson, Quaker Hill, Connecticut, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc.
3. ...
2006-10-05 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson
Case No. D2007-1567
1. The Parties
Complainant is F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland, represented internally.
Respondent is ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson, Quaker Hill, Connecticut, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Interlink Co., Ltd. ...
2008-03-03 - Case Details
D2006-1137; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1567.
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the registered trademark of Complainant and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy therefore are fulfilled.
...
2010-06-21 - Case Details
D2006-1137; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1567.
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the registered XENICAL trademarks of Complainant and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy therefore are fulfilled.
...
2009-05-13 - Case Details
E.g., F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1567 (citing Pfizer Inc. V. Jg a/k/a Josh Green, supra).
3 Respondent’s use of the domain name to earn click-through revenues, as explained above, is further evidence of the commercial nature of Respondent’s interest in the name....
2008-07-18 - Case Details
See F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1567; Aktiebolaget Electrolux v. Ferhat TUNALI, FBS (DI_4010121)/SENOL KARAKAYA/PrivacyProtect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-07-21 - Case Details
See F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1567; Aktiebolaget Electrolux v. Ferhat TUNALI, FBS (DI_4010121)/SENOL KARAKAYA/PrivacyProtect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-08-18 - Case Details
See F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1567; Aktiebolaget Electrolux v. Ferhat TUNALI, FBS (DI_4010121)/SENOL KARAKAYA/PrivacyProtect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-01-14 - Case Details
See F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1567; Giata Gesellschaft für die Entwicklung und Vermarktung interaktiver Tourismusanwendungen mbH v. ...
2009-01-06 - Case Details
D2006-0582 including , ,
, and ; Sanofi-Aventis
v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson, WIPO Case
No. D2006-0987.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Complainant argues that Respondent’s domain name consists of the Complainant’s trademark AMBIEN with the adjunction of the generic words “rx” and “store” and the gTLD “.com”, and contends that the reproduction of the AMBIEN trademark as the sole distinctive element of the disputed domain name generates a high risk of confusion with the Complainant’s trademark AMBIEN because a consumer may think that the domain name refers to the Complainant’s products.
...
2006-11-08 - Case Details
One star Global,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0583; Sanofi-Aventis v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0987).
6A.8 Therefore, and after analyzing different UDRP cases, there is no doubt in the Panel’s mind in the present case that the reproduction of the AMBIEN and ALLEGRA trademarks, as the sole distinctive element of the domain names concerned, generates confusion. ...
2007-10-09 - Case Details
D2003-0028; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. ActiveIdeas.com, Jason Peterson,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1567; Randstad General Partner (U.S.), LLC v. Domains For Sale For You,
WIPO Case No. ...
2012-05-15 - Case Details